United States v. Johnnie Traxler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining we have “specifically rejected the idea that later Supreme Court and other decisions that were not directly on point could alter the binding nature of our prior precedent”
• \This court's rule of orderliness prevents one panel from overruling the decision of a prior panel.\ (quoting McClain v. Lufkin Indus. , 649 F.3d 374 , 385 (5th Cir. 2011) )
• “Even if persuaded that [our prior panel opinion] is inconsistent with [an earlier Supreme Court opinion], we may not ignore the decision, for in this circuit one panel may not overrule the decision of a prior panel.”
• distinguishing “one-shot” operations from “ongoing ventures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).