United States v. Johnathon Caudill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction of defendant who communicated exclusively with an undercover officer to arrange meeting to have sex with minors
• affirming conviction of defendant who communicated solely with an adult intermediary and “did not seek to have any of his communications with the adult passed on directly to a child”
• rejecting defendant’s argument that none of his communications were passed along to the minor victim and holding that “a defendant who communicates solely with an adult intermediary” can be guilty of enticement
• defendant’s communication with a person he thought to be an adult who was supervising minor children was sufficient to show a knowing attempt to persuade, induce, or entice the minors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).