United States v. John Woolsey, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the Eighth Circuit has left open the possibility that a person could bring a successful as-applied challenge to § 922(g)(1)”
• hearing as- applied challenge to § 922(g)(1) but making no reference to Heller
• “[T]he Eighth Circuit has left open the possibility that a person could bring a successful as- applied challenge to § 922(g)(1)” but rejected defendant’s as- applied challenge because he had multiple violent felony con- victions.
• “[T]he Eighth Circuit has left open the possibility that a person could bring a successful as- applied challenge to § 922(g)(1)” but rejected defendant’s as- applied challenge because he had multiple violent felony con- victions.
• hearing as-applied challenge to § 922(g)(1) but not mentioning Heller
• hearing as-applied challenge to § 922(g)(1) but not mentioning Heller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).