United States v. John W. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a remand is not warranted when a mistake does not affect the district court’s selection of the sentence imposed
• concluding that a remand is not warranted when a mistake does not affect the district court’s selection of the sentence imposed
• holding that an objection on relevance grounds did not preserve objection that evidence is unduly prejudicial under Rule 403
• finding no plain error because “[t]he record is replete with evidence from which the jury could convict [the defendant]”
• failure to cite Rule 403, or mention the prejudicial effect of the evidence, constitutes waiver
• failure to cite Rule 403, or mention the prejudicial effect of the evidence, constitutes waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).