United States v. John W. Quigley Johnny Ray Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendants’ robbery of two individuals of eighty-cents that prevented the victims from reaching a grocery store to purchase beer that moved in interstate commerce did not affect interstate commerce
• discussing direct effect on commerce required in most cases and realistic probability of an effect sufficient in extortion case
• no jurisdiction where robbery victims were two individuals who were en route to a liquor store to make a purchase
• “Actions normally have a lesser effect on interstate commerce when directed at individuals rather than businesses.”
• \Actions normally have a lesser effect on interstate commerce when directed at individuals rather than businesses.\
• \Actions normally have a lesser effect on interstate commerce when directed at individuals rather than businesses.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).