United States v. John Tuma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this “rule applies to departures found in both Chapter 5, Part K of the Guidelines and in the commentary to the Guidelines”
• upholding that district court statutory maximum sentence
• upholding that district court statutory maximum sentence
• “[Defendant’s] sentence did not expose him to a mandatory minimum sentence and was well within the sentencing discretion of the district court; therefore, Alleyne is inapplicable.”
• “[Defendant’s] sentence did not expose him to a mandatory minimum sentence and was well within the sentencing discretion of the district court; therefore, Alleyne is inapplicable.”
• “We lack jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure unless the district court’s denial resulted from a mistaken belief that the Guidelines do not give it authority to depart.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).