United States v. John T. Shiel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that regulation requiring persons on government property to comply with posted signs and orders of federal officers, when construed as extending only to proper orders, was not overbroad
• holding regulation mandating compliance with officer’s order uniformly construed as applying only to proper orders and, so construed, not facially overbroad
• regulation requiring persons on official property to comply with official signs and orders of federal officers neither overbroad nor vague under First Amendment principles
• “The legitimacy of the government’s interest, in the abstract, of insuring the public’s compliance while in or on government property with proper directions of law enforcement officers . . . [is] apparent.”
• “The legitimacy of the government’s interest, in the abstract, of insuring the public’s compliance while in or on government property with proper directions of law enforcement officers . . . [is] apparent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).