United States v. John Stephen Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “where goods have no readily ascertainable market value, any reasonable method may be employed to ascribe an equivalent monetary value to the items”
• “[District courts are constitutionally required to make factual determinations underlying application of the Guidelines by at least a preponderance of the evidence.”
• “Prior to the Guidelines’ promulgation, . . . district courts employed a gestalt approach to sentencing where a single factual determination rarely had a sufficiently significant impact on the overall sentence to warrant an appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).