United States v. John Stayton, A/K/A \John Gallagher\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a twenty-three month delay was sufficient to favor dismissal with prejudice even when the crime was quite serious
• holding that “the enormity” of a twenty-three-month delay was “sufficient alone to tip this second factor in favor of dismissal of the indictment with prejudice”
• holding prosecution must show justification for delay between impaneling of jury and receipt of evidence
• holding prosecution must show justification for delay between impaneling of jury and receipt of evidence
• holding prosecution must show justification for delay between impaneling of jury and receipt of evidence
• vacating and remanding with instructions that the indictment be dismissed where the 23-month delay between voir dire and opening statements “derogated the spirit and intent of the Speedy Trial Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).