Skip to main content
· 10/6/2003

United States v. John S. Mallon

Citations

  • 345 F.3d 943
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20294
  • 2003 WL 22285302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the retroactive applica- tion of section 401(d) of the Prosecutorial Remedies and Tools Against the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (PROTECT Act), Pub. L. No. 108-21, 117 Stat. 650, which amended 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e)’s prior standard of review
  • discussing the retroactive applica- tion of section 401(d) of the Prosecutorial Remedies and Tools Against the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (PROTECT Act), Pub. L. No. 108-21, 117 Stat. 650, which amended 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e)’s prior standard of re- view
  • “A prisoner who is ineligible for transfer, and as a result of alienage becomes ineligible for transitional release, suffers a real disadvantage.”
  • “A prisoner who is ineligible for transfer, and as a result of alienage becomes ineligible for transitional release, suffers a real disadvantage.”
  • both of which applied a new standard of appellate review notwithstanding that it was adopted after conclusion of the trial court proceedings
  • “A prisoner who is ineligible for transfer, and as a result of alienage becomes ineligible for transitional release, suffers a real disadvantage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.