United States v. John Rauckhorst and Michael Slain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming 3 Defendant attempted to identify what Phoenix seeks to exclude with this request, but Phoenix’s reply suggests that Defendant’s attempt at identification is incorrect. (Def.’s Resp. Pl.’s Mot. Limine 7-8; Pl.’s Reply Mot. Limine 2-3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).