United States v. John R. Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that court should review findings of historical fact for clear error
• upholding a conviction under 924(c)(1)'s \carry\ prong for a case in which the defendant's gun was in a car's hatchback, an area the court regarded as within the car's occupants' reach
• instruction did not separately define “carry” and did not refer to terms as having separate meanings
• instruction did not separately define “carry” and did not refer to terms as having separate meanings
• officer had a reasonable suspicion, based upon objective facts obtained from other law enforcement sources, that appellant was probably driving with a suspended driver’s license
• hatchback area is search- able as part of passenger compartment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).