Skip to main content
· 7/6/1989

United States v. John N. Grayson Dorothy L. Grayson

Citations

  • 879 F.2d 620
  • 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1144
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9704
  • 1989 WL 72985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the impossibility of performance defense did not apply 16 where guarantors “were unable to discharge their duty under [a] guaranty agreement,” because 17 guarantors had not shown that “payment [] of the amounts due was objectively impossible”
  • finding that the impossibility of performance defense did not apply where 13 | guarantors “were unable to discharge their duty under [a] guaranty agreement,” because 14 | guarantors had not shown that “payment [] of the amounts due was objectively impossible”
  • “Although the Graysons were unable to discharge their duty under the guaranty agreement, it was not because payment to the EDA of the amounts due was objectively impossible.”
  • “A district court may grant summary judgment without notice if the losing party 3 has had a full and fair opportunity to ventilate the issues involved in the motion.” (internal 4 quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Kozinski, Jensen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.