· 7/6/1989
United States v. John N. Grayson Dorothy L. Grayson
Citations
- 879 F.2d 620
- 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1144
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9704
- 1989 WL 72985
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the impossibility of performance defense did not apply 16 where guarantors “were unable to discharge their duty under [a] guaranty agreement,” because 17 guarantors had not shown that “payment [] of the amounts due was objectively impossible”
- finding that the impossibility of performance defense did not apply where 13 | guarantors “were unable to discharge their duty under [a] guaranty agreement,” because 14 | guarantors had not shown that “payment [] of the amounts due was objectively impossible”
- “Although the Graysons were unable to discharge their duty under the guaranty agreement, it was not because payment to the EDA of the amounts due was objectively impossible.”
- “A district court may grant summary judgment without notice if the losing party 3 has had a full and fair opportunity to ventilate the issues involved in the motion.” (internal 4 quotation marks and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Kozinski, Jensen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.