United States v. John McLean

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence that the defendant “attempted to shred patient files subpoenaed” by the government was probative that the defendant knew he “had something to hide”
• recognizing that “inconsistent explanations” for conduct can be probative of illicit fraudulent intent
• “The stark disparity between what McLean recorded and what the angiogram showed strongly suggests he intentionally committed [health care] fraud.”
• stating elements of substantive health care fraud offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).