Skip to main content
· 12/20/1982

United States v. John Malcolm Cobb, IV

Citations

  • 697 F.2d 38
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to district court for statement of reasons under “reasonably necessary” time standard
  • “Is a motion to suppress a ‘pretrial motion’ within the meaning of [the STA]? The answer is ‘yes.’”
  • “We reject [the dis- trict judge’s] causation analysis which would require that to be excludable under [§ 3161(h)(1)(F

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Pierce, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.