United States v. John Leonard Ecker, A/K/A Leonard Hoffecker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[N]othing in the Magistrates Act permits [defendant] to bypass the first level of review simply because commitment decisions may qualify as 'collateral orders.'\
• addressing whether the magistrate judge’s order committing Ecker under § 4241 was permissible
• “The Department is obliged to balance the competing goals of the 10 statute—providing an adequate labor supply and protecting the jobs of domestic workers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).