United States v. John L. Tracy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that appellate review is possible where the appeals court can ascertain the district court's \ultimate finding\ and can find reasonable supporting evidence for it in the record
• indicating that appellate review is possible where the appeals court can ascertain the district court's \ultimate finding\ and can find reasonable supporting evidence for it in the record
• sentencing court need not set out subsidiary findings provided its ultimate findings and grounds plainly appear in record
• upholding perjury enhancement where the district court made “each of the three ultimate findings of inaccuracy, willfulness, and materiality”
• \the obstruction of justice enhancement is mandatory under U.S.S.G. S 3C1.1 where the defendant willfully obstructed or attempted to obstruct the administration of justice during the prosecution of the case\
• there is “no such requirement in sentencing determinations” that a district court provide “subsidiary findings or ... an explanation as to. the district court’s own reasoning process” provided the district court’s findings are sufficient to enable appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).