United States v. John K. Briggs, Robert Wayne Beverly and John C. Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that persons named as unindicted co-conspirators in an indictment had standing to challenge the power of a grand jury to charge them with criminal conduct without indicting them
• holding immunity did not bar a petition to strike allegations from a grand jury indictment made against named, unin-dicted alleged co-conspirators
• observing that “due process requirements vary according to particular circumstances” and that “[t]he role the sovereign plays and the nature of the governmental interest are weighed against the harm or loss resulting to the individual”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).