United States v. John J. Rodamaker, United States of America v. Kaye A. Rodamaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to recommend to the full court that it reconsider, en banc, Willis and United States v. Adipietro, 983 F.2d 1458 (8th Cir. 1993)
• district court could draw appropriate inferences from undisputed facts and was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing before denying adjustment for acceptance of responsibility
• district court not required to hold evidentiary hearing when defendant does not challenge facts in PSR, but only challenges inference to be drawn from facts
• district court may rely on facts in PSR where objections are to conclusions drawn from facts, not to facts themselves
• district court could draw appropriate inferences from undisputed facts and was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing before denying adjustment for acceptance of responsibility
• although wife may have been less culpable than husband, no minor participant reduction because she had \important role\ in scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).