Skip to main content
· 8/20/2002

United States v. John J. Noble

Citations

  • 299 F.3d 907
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16685
  • 2002 WL 1902620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “No- ble’s 30-year combined sentence does not exceed the combined maximum for the two counts, so there was no Apprendi violation.”
  • “[I]t is settled that after the appellate court vacates the sentence on a particular count, the district court on remand may adjust the entire sentencing ‘package.’ ”
  • “The purpose of [Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure] 10(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.