· 8/20/2002
United States v. John J. Noble
Citations
- 299 F.3d 907
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16685
- 2002 WL 1902620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “No- ble’s 30-year combined sentence does not exceed the combined maximum for the two counts, so there was no Apprendi violation.”
- “[I]t is settled that after the appellate court vacates the sentence on a particular count, the district court on remand may adjust the entire sentencing ‘package.’ ”
- “The purpose of [Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure] 10(e
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.