United States v. John J. Leahy, William E. Stratton, James M. Duff, and Terrence Dolan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendants’ scheme, which caused Chicago to hire fraudulently certified contractors it would not otherwise have hired, “precisely and directly targeted Chi- cago’s coffers and its position as a contracting party”
• concluding that defendants’ scheme, which caused Chicago to hire fraudulently certified contractors it would not otherwise have hired, “precisely and directly targeted Chi- cago’s coffers and its position as a contracting party”
• concluding that defendants’ scheme, which caused Chicago to hire fraudulently certified contractors it would not otherwise have hired, “precisely and directly targeted Chi- cago’s coffers and its position as a contracting party”
• concluding that defendants’ scheme, which caused Chicago to hire fraudulently certified contractors it would not otherwise have hired, “precisely and directly targeted Chi- cago’s coffers and its position as a contracting party”
• concluding that defendants’ scheme, which caused Chicago to hire fraudulently certified contractors it would not otherwise have hired, “precisely and directly targeted Chi- cago’s coffers and its position as a contracting party”
• stating that MVRA requires restitution order for offense against property including offense committed by fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).