Skip to main content
· 10/10/2002

United States v. John Irvin Pitner

Citations

  • 307 F.3d 1178
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10319
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 11898
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21165
  • 2002 WL 31261159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]uring an interlocutory appeal, the district court retains jurisdiction to address aspects of the case that are not the subject of the appeal.”
  • interpreting this language to mean “the granting of a motion for new trial or its equivalent, which would upset a verdict of conviction and occasion a new trial” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Kleinfeld, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.