Skip to main content
· 11/5/1987

United States v. John Horak, and United States of America v. John Horak

Citations

  • 833 F.2d 1235
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that RICO forfeiture is punishment imposed on a guilty defendant
  • affirming RICO conviction; defendants’ three bribes to local officials with monthly payments were sufficient to show pattern under flexible standard aimed at ongoing crimes
  • possible eighth amendment violation where forfeiture order would reach stock worth $8 million for acts of racketeering worth $712,000
  • forfeiture under Sec. 1963(a)(1) limited to interests that would not have been acquired or maintained \but for\ defendant's racketeering activities
  • \prosecutorial caprice in the choice of the enterprise\ could implicate the Eighth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.