United States v. John H. Mettler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court’s consideration 27 of the defendant’s prior conspiracies did not violate the ex post facto clause where his 28 actions “were criminal at the time they were committed [and his] sentence was within the 1 statutory maximum for both . . . offenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).