United States v. John Gregory Ardito and Vincent Pollina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an intervening holiday coupled with the unavailability of the judge excused a brief delay
• noting that the district court had “specifically cautioned the jury as to the limited purpose of the agent’s testimony”
• noting that the district court had “specifically cautioned the jury as to the limited purpose of the agent’s testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).