United States v. John Giles Mahler, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a displayed replica handgun used in a bank robbery was not covered by the dangerous-weapon enhancement
• “[T]he Sentencing Commission did not contemplate the use of a handgun replica in a robbery.”
• similarly affirming the district court’s “plainly reasonable” action of “treating the replica of a gun as an empty gun for the purpose of increasing the sentencing level” pre-Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).