Skip to main content
· 12/31/1992

United States v. John Francis Rourke

Citations

  • 984 F.2d 1063
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33980
  • 1992 WL 386255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that defendant could not challenge guilty plea under Rule 35(a) motion because “Rule 35(a) allows correction of a sentence and does not provide for an attack on the validity of the underlying conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Seymour, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.