United States v. John Fiallo-Jacome and David King Brenner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the evidence at trial to answer the “crucial factual question” of whether the defendant “continuously possessed cocaine or whether he had it in his possession on two distinct occasions”
• multiple prosecutions duplicative when based on “one continuous possession” of the same identical quantity of controlled drug

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).