Skip to main content
· 8/30/1994

United States v. John F. Schuler, Jr.

Citations

  • 34 F.3d 457
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23710
  • 1994 WL 467332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court not required to make findings about “in- appropriateness of [the probation officer’s] recommenda- tion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Easterbrook, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.