United States v. John Edward Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant “was not harmed by” a delayed disclosure and concluding that “the district court did not err in declining to permit an earlier disclosure”
• finding no error where the informant testified at trial, was subject to extensive cross-examination, and the defendant did not request a continuance or an opportunity to voir dire the informant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).