United States v. John Dillard O'Bryant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although a defendant was in- dicted in September 1982, the seventy-day window did not begin until he first appeared in the relevant court in March 1984
• holding that STA clock did not begin to run until defendant appeared before district court with counsel and entered not guilty plea, despite having initially appeared before court several days earlier
• “We also reject O’Bryant’s contention that the inventory search exception to the general prohibition against warrantless searches was violated because [the officer] did not prepare a complete list of the briefcase's contents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).