· 12/26/1996
Federal Case
Citations
- 104 F.3d 566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court’s decision to permit defendant corporations to proceed in criminal proceedings represented only by non-attorney, chief executive officer violated Sixth Amendment right to counsel
- recognizing that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are\ordinarily more appropriate for collateral attack\
- noting that the judge has discretion to allow or deny a request after trial has begun
- explaining that corporation may not appear pro se, and may not be represented by officer not licensed to practice law
- noting that the judge has discretion to allow or deny a request after trial has begun
- explaining that a corporation may not appear pro se
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.