Skip to main content
· 12/26/1996

Federal Case

Citations

  • 104 F.3d 566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court’s decision to permit defendant corporations to proceed in criminal proceedings represented only by non-attorney, chief executive officer violated Sixth Amendment right to counsel
  • recognizing that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are\ordinarily more appropriate for collateral attack\
  • noting that the judge has discretion to allow or deny a request after trial has begun
  • explaining that corporation may not appear pro se, and may not be represented by officer not licensed to practice law
  • noting that the judge has discretion to allow or deny a request after trial has begun
  • explaining that a corporation may not appear pro se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.