United States v. John Clifford Chaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The rule in this circuit is that . . . ‘the sudden unexplained acquisition of wealth by an impecunious person at or about the time of a theft which he had an opportunity to commit, is competent evidence of guilt and will support . . . conviction.’” (citation omitted)
• no proof that alibi witnesses existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).