United States v. John Cioffi Mussare, Iii, A/K/A J.J. John Cioffi Mussare, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reversal is appropriate only when there is “no evidence, regardless of how it is weighted, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”
• rejecting “categorical right to inquire into the penalty a cooperating witness would otherwise have received”
• interpreting Chandler to mean \that the proper inquiry under the first prong [i]s 'whether ... the jury might have received a significantly different impression of [the witness's] credibility' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).