United States v. John C. Winston, D.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting § “455(a) and (b)(1) are to be construed together when the ground for recusal is the bias or partiality of the trial judge,” which means § 455(a)’s objective, fact-specific standard applies to recusal under § 455(b)(1)
• “pre-trial knowledge of the facts of a case, independent of any possible bias or partiality” solo justificaría una inhibición cuando “the information is derived from an extra-judicial source”
• “pre-trial knowledge of the facts of a case, independent of any possible bias or partiality” solo justificaría una inhibición cuando “the information is derived from an extra-judicial source”
• “[R]ecusal is appropriate only when the information is derived from an extra-judicial 5 source”
• “[R]ecusal is appropriate only when the information is derived from an extra-judicial 5 source”
• “[R]ecusal is appropriate only when the information is derived from an extra-judicial 5 source”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).