· 1/24/1994
United States v. John C. Hudson, Larry Baresel, and Jack Butler Rackley
Citations
- 14 F.3d 536
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “the fact that a statute may be remedial does not necessarily mean that sanctions imposed thereunder are solely remedial”
- administrative order barring defendants from future banking activities not bar to subsequent prosecution for related criminal offense
- “[S]anctions are [not] necessarily presumed to be punitive when the express language” of the relevant statute or regulation “allows for remedial sanctions.”
- Rule 9(b) requires particularity “so that the defendant can prepare 15 an adequate answer”
- “We are careful to note that a determination that a sanction is at least in part punishment requires that it must be explained as also serving as a deterrent or retribution, not merely that it may be so explained.”
- revocable ban from participation in banking activities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Seth, Goodwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.