Skip to main content
· 1/24/1994

United States v. John C. Hudson, Larry Baresel, and Jack Butler Rackley

Citations

  • 14 F.3d 536
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “the fact that a statute may be remedial does not necessarily mean that sanctions imposed thereunder are solely remedial”
  • administrative order barring defendants from future banking activities not bar to subsequent prosecution for related criminal offense
  • “[S]anctions are [not] necessarily presumed to be punitive when the express language” of the relevant statute or regulation “allows for remedial sanctions.”
  • Rule 9(b) requires particularity “so that the defendant can prepare 15 an adequate answer”
  • “We are careful to note that a determination that a sanction is at least in part punishment requires that it must be explained as also serving as a deterrent or retribution, not merely that it may be so explained.”
  • revocable ban from participation in banking activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Seth, Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.