United States v. John B. Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the Government’s testimony that it was “routine . . . for mail in the outgoing basket to be picked up and placed in the United States mail” as “sufficient [evi- dence] for the jury to determine that the mail was used”
• defendant not entitled to separate good faith instruction when an adequate instruction on specific intent is given (citing United States v. Cusino, 694 F.2d 185, 188 (9th Cir. 1982))
• in mail fraud case, proof of mailing at issue established based on “testimony by a Bechtel employee that it was the routine at Bechtel for mail in the outgoing basket to be picked up and placed in the United States mail’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).