United States v. John Arrocha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that nothing in the Fourth Amendment requires a police department to allow an arrested person to arrange for another person to pick up his car to avoid impoundment and inventory
• explaining that the inventory search doctrine “encompasses distinct police actions”
• “Nothing in the Fourth Amendment requires a police department to allow an arrested person to arrange for another person to pick up his car to avoid impoundment and inventory.”-(quotation omitted)
• \Nothing in the Fourth Amendment requires a police department to allow an arrested person to arrange for another person to pick up his car to avoid impoundment and inventory.\ (quoting United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 873 (8th Cir. 1994
• \Nothing in the Fourth Amendment requires a police department to allow an arrested person to arrange for another person to pick up his car to avoid impoundment and inventory.\ (quoting United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 873 (8th Cir. 1994
• “[W]hen there is a valid reason to impound a vehicle, the presence of an investigative motive does not invalidate an otherwise valid inventory search.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).