United States v. John Anthony Sisto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proof of prior inconsistent statement may be elicited by extrinsic evidence only if witness on cross examination denies making it
• allowing impeachment testimony that provides devastating evidence with respect to the one contested element of the crime, as long as the court provides a cautionary instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).