United States v. John Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts may consider post- 14 sentencing conduct when evaluating motions under Section 404
• “[Section] 404’s language does not require courts to ignore all developments that occurred after the defendant committed the covered offense when considering whether to reduce a defendant’s sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Steven Jones
  Eleventh Circuit· 2020-06-16· cited 248×
• United States v. Antone White
  D.C. Circuit· 2020-12-29· cited 33×
• United States v. Lazelle Maxwell
  Sixth Circuit· 2021-03-19· cited 32×
• United States v. Antonio Harris
  Eighth Circuit· 2020-06-05· cited 26×
• United States v. Michael Johnson, II
  Sixth Circuit· 2022-02-23· cited 21×
• United States v. Gadsden
  Second Circuit· 2020-12-08· cited 19×
• United States v. Jesse Bailey
  Sixth Circuit· 2022-03-08· cited 12×
• United States v. Jamel Smithers
  Sixth Circuit· 2020-05-26· cited 11×
• United States v. Robert Ware
  Sixth Circuit· 2020-06-30· cited 11×
• United States v. Dwight Barber
  Sixth Circuit· 2020-07-17· cited 8×
• United States v. Shawn Williams
  Sixth Circuit· 2020-08-26· cited 7×
• United States v. Clarence Goodwin
  Sixth Circuit· 2023-11-28· cited 7×
• United States v. Warren Lavell Jackson
  Eleventh Circuit· 2020-06-16
• United States v. Thomas Johnson
  Eleventh Circuit· 2020-06-16
• United States v. Alfonso Allen
  Eleventh Circuit· 2020-06-16
• United States v. Gene Sutton
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-06-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Christie
  Second Circuit· 2013-11-15· cited 76×
• United States v. Rose
  S.D. Illinois· 2019-05-24· cited 21×
• United States v. Metcalfe
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-09-28· cited 6×