United States v. John A. Krankel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “bald, unsupported assertions” by defendant cannot refute presentence investigation report
• explaining that unverified declarations from the defendant are not evidence that can refute a presentence report
• explaining that unverified declarations from the defendant are not evidence that can refute a presentence report
• district court properly excluded evidence that did not tend to prove or disprove an element of the crime charged
• trial court did not abuse its discretion excluding evidence that did “not tend to prove or disprove an element of the crime charged”
• facts stated in PSR are reliable when consistent with witness testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).