United States v. Joey Santillan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a criminal violation of the Lacey Act does not require the defendant to know precisely which law or regulation established the illegality of the taking of wildlife, but only that the defendant know (1) that he is importing or exporting wildlife and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).