United States v. Joel L. Heilprin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the defendant’s conduct as “waiver” but treating it as forfeiture
• no constitutional or statutory right to be informed of a probation officer’s sentencing recom- mendation
• no constitutional or statutory right to be informed of a probation officer’s sentencing recom- mendation
• court is “at all times perfectly free to disagree with the probation officer's position”
• court is “at all times perfectly free to disagree with the probation officer's position”
• explaining the constitutional propriety of confidential sentencing recommendations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).