United States v. Joel Gerard Ameling Tina Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “false statements and inconsistent stories” “[c]ombined with . . . facts justifying the initial stop” created probable cause
• stating that \apparently false statements and inconsistent stories were sufficient to give the officers probable cause that the defendants were involved in criminal conduct\
• concluding legal purchases, in addition to other factors, supported a finding of reasonable suspicion
• noting that, among other things, “apparently false statements and inconsistent stories were sufficient to give the officers probable cause that the defendants were involved in criminal conduct”
• noting that the Fourth Amendment applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
• allowing a passenger to make a Fourth Amendment challenge to the admissibility of evidence gleaned from an allegedly illegal traffic stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).