Skip to main content
· 5/26/2005

United States v. Joel Andrew Wyatt, AKA \Lupine\ Rebecca Kay Smith

Citations

  • 408 F.3d 1257
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9635
  • 2005 WL 1243979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting the statutory definition of “includes” as “non-exhaustive rather than exclusive.”
  • “The use of the word ‘includes’ suggests the list is non-exhaustive rather than exclusive.”
  • “The use of the word ‘includes’ suggests the list is non-exhaustive rather than exclusive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, McKeown, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.