United States v. Joe Walker and Iverson Broadway, A/K/A Skeet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that witness' viola- tion of rule may affect weight of testimony
• “failure of a witness to comply with the sequestration rule does not of itself render his testimony inadmissible”
• “Because the defendants opened the door to this line of questioning, the government’s questions on redirect were permissible.”
• “Cross-examination with respect to part of a transaction enables the opposing party to elicit evidence on re-direct examination of the whole transaction at least to the extent that it relates to the same subject.”
• “Because the prejudicial impact of the evidence elicited by the government was slight, the probative value of the re-direct examination in rebutting a possible defense clearly outweighs any prejudicial impact. Accordingly, the testimony was properly admitted.”
• “Because the prejudicial impact of the evidence elicited by the government was slight, the probative value of the re-direct examination in rebutting a possible defense clearly outweighs any prejudicial impact. Accordingly, the testimony was properly admitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).