United States v. Joe Thomas Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the reviewing court “need only ascertain whether the charge, when viewed as a whole, fairly and correctly states the issues and law”
• proferred testimony excluded as collateral because it related to alleged purpose of meeting between defendant and informant, rather than to the incriminating statements made at the meeting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).