United States v. Joaquin Rojas-Coria, Also Known as Kinieno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant’s proffer was incomplete when the defendant refused to discuss his “involvement in other drug activity, occurring during the same time period” as his offense of conviction
• noting that Booker has no impact upon a sentence determined by a statutory mandatory minimum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).