United States v. Joaquin Ospina (93-3129) and Mary Miller (93-3353)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “there is no requirement in [Rule] 11 that the court explicitly admonish a defendant that a sentence may be imposed consecutively”
• “there is no requirement in [Rule] 11 that the court explicitly admonish a defendant that a sentence may be imposed consecutively”
• \[T]here is no requirement in Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 that the court explicitly admonish a defendant that a sentence must be imposed consecutively.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).