United States v. Joaquin Augusto Diaz and Jose Guillermo Guapacha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no improper suppression of evidence under Brady where evidence at issue involved defendant's whereabouts, which were within defendant's knowledge
• concluding that there was no improper suppression of evidence under Brady where evidence at issue involved defendant's whereabouts, which were within defendant's knowledge
• concluding that there was no improper suppression of evidence under Brady where evidence at issue involved defendant's whereabouts, which were within defendant's knowledge
• concluding that Brady was not violated where evidence at issue was within the defendant's knowledge
• concluding that Brady was not violated where evidence at issue was within defendant’s knowledge
• concluding that there SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 42 (0) 1947A .4e40 was no improper suppression of evidence under Brady where evidence at issue involved defendant's whereabouts, which were within defendant's knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).